The influx of "newcomers" to the small towns and villages where the mayor of the mayoralty will be elected, is particularly large. The inhabitants of some of such villages have suddenly increased by more than 50% in the first 4 months of the year. The record holders in this regard are municipalities such as Nevestino, Treklyano, Makresh, Novo Selo, etc.
According to the law, 100 inhabitants of a small settlement can elect a mayor. The rules are now the same as in the 2015 local elections, when in the last months before the mandatory permanent residency period expired, we witnessed an unprecedented influx of newly registered residents across the country. "Why didn't this happen in the local elections in 2019?" asks rhetorically Iva Lazarova, head of IPED and answers: "Because then they temporarily changed the law and 350 people were needed to elect a mayor."
Indeed, it is more difficult to bring 200-300 fictitious new residents by document only to a given village than 100.
"Very few voters are needed in the race for the post of mayor of a small village:, says Iva Lazarova. “When "newcomers" settle in a village with 120 inhabitants and their number is huge compared to that of people with a permanent address, these voices coming from outside can actually change the results of the vote and decide who will rule the village in the next 4 years. Our hypothesis is that these people are transferred from the larger municipal centers to the smaller settlements. Because when a person moves from a given municipality to a village on its territory, in addition to not losing his or her right to vote for municipal mayor and municipal council, the voter also gains the right to vote for the mayor of the village in which he or she registered."
A village mayor has a direct relationship with the municipal mayor who distributes public resources and participates in European projects. "It is much easier for the municipal mayor to have a direct relationship with the village mayor and for them to be from the same party, so that they can use the funds under the European projects together," says Iva Lazarova. Is domestic election tourism legal and does it have anything to do with vote buying?
"It is difficult to prove that domestic electoral tourism is a crime against electoral rights. For example, mandatory checks can be appointed in all municipalities where there is a significant increase in new address registrations and the competent authorities can track whether these people have received any incentive to move. We should not forget that the mayors manage the territory of the respective village, administer the services there, manage the municipal property, etc. It is behind these economic factors that the reasons why electoral tourism in their villages can be hidden,"says Iva Lazarova in conclusion.
Read also:
Translated and published by Rositsa Petkova
"In the European Parliament we commemorate the end of World War II. Eighty years later, we truly live in peace, but we are also under attack. We do not pose threats to anyone, but others are posing threats to us". This was stated Nathalie..
"The approach currently being proposed creates preconditions for redirecting funds from one program to another, which is dangerous for some of the key social policies, such as the cohesion policy, " said Tsvetelina Penkova, MEP from the Progressive..
“In the European Parliament, the word ‘compromise’ does not necessarily carry a negative meaning. Compromise refers to finding common ground in a highly fragmented environment. There's a difference in the culture, the rhetoric of communication. In the..
Partly Cloudy
Clear